-wg
How
Deep is Deep?
Like so many aspects of the art of hypnosis, the
whole concept of depth is an abstraction. We tend to think of going
into trance as going “down,” so it is logical to measure degrees
of how far down and to call those degrees “depth.” In reality,
though, hypnosis isn't a vertical thing; it is merely an altered
state of consciousness, one of focused concentration. So when we say
someone is going deeper, what we
really mean is they are becoming more focused on the trance state and
less inclined to respond to external stimuli or distractions.
In the mid 20th
century two major scales for measuring hypnotic depth were commonly
used: the Friedlander-Sarbin scale and the later Stanford Scales,
developed by Andre Weitzenhoffer and Ernest Hilgard. These sought to
measure hypnotic depth by applying a series of test suggestions of
increasing difficulty – that is, requiring an increasing ability to
distort, ignore, or invent sensory information to comply with
hypnotic suggestions. The problem with these measurements is that
they assume everyone is identical in that everyone, if they are “deep
enough,” can perform every suggestion on the scale. In reality
people's minds are different; some people find it far easier than the
scale's inventors thought to do some things and all but impossible to
do others regardless of trance depth. The scales also fail to take
into account that people get better at manifesting trance phenomena
with practice. Today most of the professional hypnotists I know
don't bother with these formal scales unless they are conducting
research and need to cater to academia.
- Not Hypnotized Yet.
- Deep Enough.
- Too Deep.
When you start, your
partner is Not Hypnotized Yet. Once you've completed your induction
and your partner is following suggestions, they are Deep Enough. If
your trancee is so zoned out that they aren't responding to you
anymore, then they are Too Deep. Isn't that simple?
There is a tendency
among hypnotists, especially those who do only recreational hypnosis
and not therapy, to put too much emphasis on this abstract concept of
depth. In many people's minds, the deeper someone goes into trance
the more control the hypnotist has over them. In the hypnokink
community that's half the thrill for some people – they want to
feel like they're being taken over, compelled, controlled. And if
the “deeper equals more controlled” chestnut is part of their
fantasy, there's nothing wrong with indulging it. But as a
hypnotist, understand that it's a myth.
In my experience, when
a partner does not respond as expected to a suggestion, their level
of hypnotic depth has little or nothing to do with it – unless,
that is, they have reached Too Deep and are blissfully ignoring me.
Many times it is a matter of trust and rapport; they don't feel
comfortable doing what I've suggested in the current environment, or
doing it for me. Equally often there is just something wrong with
the suggestion.
Shortly after we first
met, my now-wife Dani had an experience that perfectly illustrates
what I mean by “something wrong with the suggestion.” She was
trancing online with someone who was somewhat known in the online
community and considered safe and competent. They were using text
chat as the medium, which is a frequent thing online. The hypnotist,
whose photo was displayed by the chat client, took Dani into trance
and told her to look at his photo and see the hat on his head. Dani
looked at the photo and saw no hat because there wasn't one – he
was trying for a visual hallucination. So she told him, “There is
no hat.”
His response? “Deeper
… deeper … now, look up and see the hat.”
“No, still no hat.
Maybe we should try something else.”
“DEEEEEEEEEEPERRRRRRRRRR!!”
After a few more tries
he gave up on the hat and moved on to something else. He told Dani
that there is no number between 3 and 5, absolutely no number. Then
he told her to type from 1 to 10 for him. Dani obediently put her
finger on the keyboard and typed the numbers, including the number 4
that she was supposed to forget.
“DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!”
You'll be shocked, I'm
sure, to read that no matter how many times he told her to go deeper,
Dani kept seeing the number 4 right there on the keyboard and typing
it.
So, why didn't taking
Dani deeper make those suggestions work?
Think back to the
beginning of this chapter, when we discussed modalities. Not
everyone is equally good at either imagining or ignoring a given
sense's input. “See the hat” was an attempt at a visual
hallucination, but Dani is a kinesthetic – her mind is not very
good at inventing images because it doesn't do it often. Until she
gets a lot more practice at concocting visual things, no amount of
deepening is going to get her to see the hat. If he had suggested
that she touch the top of her own head and feel
a hat there, that would have been very successful.
Forgetting the
number 4 is a common stage show ploy. It works so well that stage
hypnotists tend to use it to weed out people who aren't focused and
ready to play. I'm sure the guy who played with Dani thinks it
didn't work because she's not a “good subject” but that would be
seriously wrong. Dani is very talented at going into trance and can
do some very impressive things given a well-worded suggestion. But
when you tell her something doesn't exist, like the number 4, and
then put it right in front of her eyes,
she's going to remember it immediately. Since this was a text chat
and he knew she would be seeing it right there on the keyboard, he
should have prepared for that. Something as simple as, “As you
type, you may notice a key with an odd-looking symbol on the keyboard
between the 3 key and the 5 key, but you can just ignore that key and
skip past it” would probably have been enough.
Finally, remember that
going into trance and learning to focus enough that you can readily
fabricate, ignore, or alter memories, sensations, and physical
responses is a skill. Some people are naturally good at it; most of
us need practice to become proficient. So if a suggestion fails, and
you've made certain it's not worded poorly and your partner has no
reservations about the suggestion, it may be something that your
partner just isn't able to do yet. Come back to it when they've had
more experience, or start with something less ambitious in a similar
vein and work your way up. For instance, if your partner is having
trouble with hypnotic amnesia and is remembering a trance session
when you've asked them to forget it happened, try asking them to
forget only one specific thing that happened during the trance first.
Then try a longer bit, and a longer bit, until they are able to
temporarily forget an entire trance session.
So, having now
told you why depth of trance is not important to successful
suggestions and that the whole concept of hypnotic depth is
overrated, I'm still going to teach you some deepeners. Deepeners
can be instrumental in helping an inexperienced hypnotee get focused
and accustomed to the trance state. Also, sometimes your partner
will just want to be taken super deep simply for the pleasure of it;
as a service dom, I want you to know how to do that.
Another thing that can go wrong is they are perfectly capable of performing the suggestion you gave them, but what you thought you were saying is not what they heard. I gave a young lady a suggestion that when she wore a particular belt she would walk like "sex on a stick" (her term), but not notice until after she took the belt off. Of course, one she took the belt off she was no longer walking that way.
ReplyDelete"How did it feel to be walking like sex on a stick when you wore the belt?"
"What are you talking about?"
(I don't think that suggestion means what you think it means ... Inconceivable!)
JN